Read the general internship’s column, not another program’s benefits.
The WTO page checked September 16, 2026 presents several different programs. For the general internship, it gives a minimum age of 21, a placement of up to six months and ongoing recruitment. Its roster is not an offer, and membership in the applicant pool does not establish a start date.
| Item | Reviewed guidance |
|---|---|
| Nationality | WTO member or accession-country/territory nationality. |
| Education | Completed undergraduate degree plus the specified master’s/postgraduate condition; see the full source. |
| Master’s route | At least one completed year while enrolled, or the stated higher-study/recent-graduate alternatives. |
| Recent completion | Master’s/PhD completed within two years of selection under the listed alternative. |
| Support | CHF60 per calendar day, including weekends/holidays; travel not covered; insurance arranged by intern. |
| Next step | Apply through the official route; no universal forthcoming deadline established here. |
Sources[1]
Do not combine the most favorable terms from different programs.
A comparison page can tempt a reader to take eligibility from one column and funding from another. Instead, copy the complete program name into your record and keep all its conditions together. If a special route appears more suitable, evaluate it as a separate application, not as an upgrade automatically attached to the general one.
The same discipline applies to age and academic stage. A minimum age does not create an unstated maximum. A completed undergraduate degree does not by itself satisfy a postgraduate condition. And a deadline calculated from selection is not necessarily calculated from application. Write the actual dates you need the employer to evaluate rather than merely stating that you are a recent graduate.
For an unusual degree sequence, ask a specific question with the qualification, enrollment and completion dates. A concise factual description is more useful than asking whether exceptions are available in general. Keep the response attached to the program and cycle for which it was given.
Show that you can define a trade-policy comparison.
Select an output small enough for a reviewer to inspect: a comparison of two policy provisions, an annotated data table or a short explanation of a trade measure. Identify the jurisdiction, date and scope. A rule affecting one product category cannot be generalized to all imports, and a tariff figure is not a complete landed-cost estimate.
Use primary materials you are allowed to share and retain the exact passages or table references behind your interpretation. Separate what the source states from what you infer. If two documents use different definitions, explain the mismatch instead of forcing them into a clean chart.
Your application should describe the work you performed. Reading about a dispute is not representing a party to it; completing a course exercise is not professional legal advice. A carefully bounded project can still demonstrate writing, source interpretation and analytical discipline.
Distinguish a tariff-rate change from the total import bill.
This original fictional exercise is not a WTO question or legal advice. An item has a customs value of $200 per unit. Under a simple ad valorem model, a tariff rises from 5% to 8%, with 1,000 units imported and no exemptions or other charges. Calculate the change in the tariff payment and identify what the example does not tell you.
At 5%, tariff payment is $10 per unit and $10,000 in total. At 8%, it is $16 per unit and $16,000. The tariff rate rises three percentage points, the tariff payment rises 60%, and the simplified customs value plus tariff rises from $210 to $216 per unit, about 2.86%. These are three different percentage statements.
The calculation does not establish the retail price increase. Import volume, exchange rates, margins, contracts and the relevant customs rules are not supplied. Keep those questions outside the simple result. A useful memo leads with the quantity it actually calculated rather than saying prices rose 60%.
For a second version, let volume fall to 900 units while keeping the stated customs value and 8% tariff. Total tariff payment becomes $14,400. The policy rate and the revenue collected respond to different inputs. Explain the change without presenting the fictional volume response as a forecast.
Translate the daily allowance into the actual calendar.
Keep daily and monthly amounts separate. As a planning illustration, CHF60 for 30 eligible calendar days is CHF1,800; a 31-day period is CHF1,860. Neither is a confirmed monthly salary or proof that accommodation is covered. Confirm the dates and terms of an actual appointment before budgeting.
WTO program comparison
Prepare an expense list for travel, housing, deposits, insurance and ordinary living costs. Keep currencies explicit and record the date of any exchange-rate assumption. Ask which amounts must be paid before the first allowance. The right decision depends on both total cost and cash timing.
Finish the application with a precise account of your academic status, relevant work and availability. Keep the roster or application acknowledgment separate from an offer. While awaiting a decision, maintain other suitable options rather than interpreting silence as either selection or rejection.